Ex parte LI - Page 3




          Appeal No.  1997-1236                                                            
          Application No. 08/212,385                                                       


                     one or more secondary supporting sites; and                           
          optical RF link systems linking the secondary supporting sites                   
          to the master supporting site; wherein the secondary                             
          supporting sites comprise means for transmitting or receiving                    
          navigation RF signals; wherein the optical RF link systems                       
          comprise: (a) means for receiving navigation RF signals from                     
          one end; (b) means for up-converting the navigation RF signals                   
          to an optical signal;(c) means for transiting the optical                        
          signal from one end to a second end; (d) means for down-                         
          converting the optical signal at the second end to a                             
          navigation RF signal; and (e) means for transiting the                           
          navigation RF signals between the secondary supporting sites                     
          and the master supporting site.                                                  

          The examiner relies on the following references:                                 
          Li                            5,294,930          Mar. 15, 1994                   
          Keolian et al. (Keolian)      5,313,266          May  17, 1994                   
          (filed Aug. 17,                                                                  
          1992)                                                                            
          Kiasaleh                      5,319,438          June 07, 1994                   
          (filed Jan. 24,                                                                  
          1992)                                                                            
          Claims 1-20 stand rejected under the judicially                                  
          created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting as being                   
          unpatentable over claims 1-20 of U. S. Patent No. 5,294,930                      
          issued to appellant Li.  Claims 1-20 also stand rejected under                   
          35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness the examiner                        
          offers Keolian in view of Kiasaleh.                                              
          Rather than repeat the arguments of appellant or the                             



                                            3                                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007