Appeal No. 1997-1282
Application No. 07/839,369
peelable interface advantageously provides “renewable
surfaces” for manufactured products as indicated supra.
Upon return of this application, the examiner should:
(1) Determine whether Rackovan is qualified as “prior art”
for purposes of 35 U.S.C. §§ 102 and 103; and
(2) Determine whether Freedman taken together with Rackovan
(if qualified as “prior art”) and/or Dudley would have
rendered the claimed subject matter obvious within the meaning
of 35 U.S.C.
§ 103.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007