Ex parte BERNACCHI et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1997-1294                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/524,763                                                                                                             







                          Claims 1 through 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103                                                                      
                 as unpatentable over the disclosure of U.S. Patent 4,260,637                                                                           
                 issued to Rispoli et al. on April 7, 1981 (hereinafter                                                                                 
                 referred to as “Rispoli”).2                                                                                                            
                          We reverse.                                                                                                                   
                          The claimed subject matter is directed to “[a] breading                                                                       
                 crumb product for application to a food substrate, comprising,                                                                         
                 before application to the substrate, a breading crumb having                                                                           
                 incorporated therein about 1 to 10 wt% of at least one heat-                                                                           
                 set protein....”  See, e.g., claim 1.  According to pages 3                                                                            
                 and 4 of the specification, the breading crum having                                                                                   
                 incorporated therein about 1 to 10 wt% of at least heat set                                                                            


                          2The examiner has withdrawn the rejection of claims 1 and                                                                     
                 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Rispoli.  The                                                                             
                 examiner also states that “[t]he rejection of claim 27 has                                                                             
                 been dropped in view of appellants [sic, appellant’s]                                                                                  
                 response.”  However, it is not clear from the record what, if                                                                          
                 any, rejection has been dropped.  It does not appear that the                                                                          
                 § 103 rejection of claim 27 over Rispoli has been withdrawn                                                                            
                 since the examiner has repeated the § 103 rejection of claims                                                                          
                 1 through 31 over Rispoli.                                                                                                             
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007