Appeal No. 1997-1331 Application 08/289,679 the provision of a plurality of switches. Thus, each of the independent claims on appeal call for a pair of continuous uninterrupted electrical conductors having insulation thereon. The examiner considers that Ward discloses a gas burner manifold assembly substantially as claimed except for “conductors or lead[s] passing continuously through the housing with the contacts piercing the insulation of the conductors to make contact [therewith]” (answer, page 4). The examiner further considers that Munroe discloses “line switches in which the leads 66 and 68 are continuous and uninterrupted as they lead up to and away from the switch” (answer, page 7). Based on the above, the examiner concludes that it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art “to apply the teachings of Munroe to Ward to have the continuous conductors [of Munroe?] pass through the housing [of Ward?] to be pierced by the contacts because both Munroe and Ward set up types of line switches in which plural switches are placed in parallel using parallel leads ” (answer, page 5). In the “response to argument” section of the answer, the -4-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007