Appeal No. 1997-1349
Application 08/520,629
Takach, Jr. et al. 4,830,328 May 16, 1989
(Takach) (Filed April 24,
1987)
Holmberg 4,851,812 Jul. 25, 1989
(Filed June 7, 1988)
Hawkins et al. 5,200,913 Apr. 6, 1993
(Hawkins)
Kunii 63-39 731 Mar. 15, 1988
Claims 24, 25, 31 through 33, 37, 38, 43, 56, and 79
through 82 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Kunii. Claims 26 through 30 and 44 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kunii
and Takach. Claims 34 through 36 and 45 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kunii and Holmberg.
Claims 39, 40, 46 through 48, 54, and 57 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kunii and Cohen.
Claims 49 through 52 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Kunii, Cohen, and Takach. Claim 53
stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Kunii, Cohen, and Nigro. Claims 41 and 42 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kunii and
Nigro. Claims 24 through 54, 56, 57, and 79 through 82 stand
rejected under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-
type double patenting over Hawkins.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007