Ex parte RAHM et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 20              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                      Ex parte RANDALL L. RAHM, KEVIN B. AVERY,                       
                                and MARK H. BERGGREN                                  
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1997-1464                                  
                               Application 08/235,542                                 
                                     __________                                       
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     __________                                       

          Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal from the refusal of the                
          examiner to allow claims 1 through 9 and 19 through 27 as                   
          amended subsequent to the final rejection.  These are all of                
          the claims remaining in the application.                                    
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007