Appeal No. 1997-1479
Application No. 08/418,579
invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claims 15
and 16, respective copies of which appear on pages 1 and 2 of
the brief (Paper No. 19).
As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the
documents listed below:
Parker et al. 4,588,383 May 13,
1986
(Parker)
Morgan et al. 4,610,254 Sep. 9,
1986
(Morgan)
The following rejection is before us for review.
Claims 2 through 7 and 9 through 16 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Parker in view of
Morgan.
The examiner’s rejection, as it pertains in particular to
independent claims 15 and 16, and the response to the argument
presented by appellants appears in the answer (Paper No. 20),
while the complete statement of appellants’ argument can be
found in the brief (Paper No. 19).
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007