THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte LARRY J. GRANT and CLARKE BERDAN II
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-1491
Application 08/478,167
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,
3-16, 19-25, 35 and 36. Claims 2, 17 and 18 stand objected to
as being dependent upon a rejected claim. Claims 26-34, the
other claims remaining in the present application, have been
allowed by the examiner. Claim 1 is illustrative:
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007