Appeal No. 1997-1516
Application No. 08/326,501
As a final point, regarding the § 103 rejections of
claims 1 and 3-10, which we have sustained based upon Hosoda,
appellant bases no argument upon objective evidence of
nonobviousness, such as unexpected results.
In conclusion, since we have sustained the examiner's
rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1 and 3-10 and have
reversed all the examiner's rejections of claim 2, the
examiner's decision is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CHARLES F. WARREN ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007