Appeal No. 1997-1551 Application No. 08/235,597 Pursuant to the provisions of 37 C.F.R. ' 1.196(b), we make the following new grounds of rejection. Claims 1-6 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. ' 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite. Claim 1, lines 8 and 9, recite Aa particle size range larger than approximately 1.0- 2.0 microns@, but it is unclear whether the particles are larger than 1.0 micron or 2.0 micron.7 Clarification is needed. For example, are particles having a size of 1.5 microns within or without the claims? Claim 1 does not have antecedent basis for Athe wet reagent@ found at line 16. The claim recites Aa reagent@ at line 14, but clarification is needed as to whether Athe wet reagent@ of line 16 is the same as the Areagent@ of line 14. CONCLUSION The rejections of claims 1-6 are reversed. This decision contains a new ground of rejection pursuant to 37 C.F.R. ' 1.196(b)(amended effective Dec. 1, 1997, by final rule notice, 62 Fed. Reg. 53, 131, 53, 197 (Oct. 10, 1997), 1203 Off. Gaz. Pat. & Trademark Office 63, 122 (Oct. 21, 1997)). 37 CFR ' 1.196(b) provides that, AA new ground of rejection shall not be considered final for purposes of judicial review.@ 37 C.F.R. ' 1.196(b) also provides that the appellant, WITHIN TWO MONTHS FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options 7 Reference is made to lines 8 and 9 of claim 1 in the April 25, 1996 Amendment after Final Rejection. 13Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007