Page 8
The rejection of claims 89 through 104 and 106 through 112 under 35
U.S.C.
§ 112, first paragraph, as the specification as originally filed does not provide
support for the invention as now claimed is reversed. .
The rejection of claims 89 through 104 and 106 through 112 under 35
U.S.C.
§ 112, second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and
distinctly claim the subject matter which applicant regards as the invention is
reversed.
The rejection of claims 89 through 104 and 106 through 112 under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Fath, and Powrie in view of Bagdigian, Doebbler and
Seebeck is reversed.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007