THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 38
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte HARALD SCHWAGER and JUERGEN KERTH
________________
Appeal No. 1997-1750
Application No. 08/524,024
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before KIMLIN, OWENS and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 8-
11, all the claims remaining in the present application.
Claim 8 is illustrative:
8. A process for preparing a propylene-ethylene
copolymer which is conducted in three distinct polymerization
steps in the gas phase in an agitated fixed bed by means of a
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007