Ex parte BUENDIA et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
          publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                      

                                                               Paper No. 15           



                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                               Ex parte JEAN BUENDIA,                                 
                                PATRICK ROUSSEL, and                                  
                                    MICHEL VIVAT                                      
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-1767                                  
                             Application No. 08/442,959                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      
          Before WALTZ, LIEBERMAN, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                  
          from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 11 and 12, which                
          are the only claims remaining in the application.  These                    
          claims were amended subsequent to the final rejection in the                







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007