Ex parte VAN DEN ZEGEL et al. - Page 1




                                      The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and                                                   
                                                                       is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                          
                                                                                                                                                   Paper No. 22                        

                                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                            
                                                                                  ____________                                                                                         

                                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                            
                                                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                           
                                                                                  ____________                                                                                         

                                                        Ex parte MARC VAN DEN ZEGEL, JAN CLAES,                                                                                        
                                                                  and JEAN-MARIE DEWANCKELE1                                                                                           
                                                                                  ____________                                                                                         

                                                                             Appeal No. 1997-1834                                                                                      
                                                                         Application No. 08/267,5272                                                                                   
                                                                                  ____________                                                                                         

                                                                          HEARD: October 23, 2000                                                                                      
                                                                                  ____________                                                                                         

                     Before JOHN D. SMITH, LIEBERMAN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                          
                     TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                                




                                                                          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                           

                                This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims                                                       

                     1-8.  Claims 9 and 10, the only other claims in the application, stand withdrawn as directed to a non-                                                            

                     elected invention.                                                                                                                                                



                                1The real party in interest is Agfa-Gevaert.                                                                                                           
                                2Application for patent filed June 29, 1994.                                                                                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007