The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and
is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MARC VAN DEN ZEGEL, JAN CLAES,
and JEAN-MARIE DEWANCKELE1
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1834
Application No. 08/267,5272
____________
HEARD: October 23, 2000
____________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, LIEBERMAN, and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
TIMM, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims
1-8. Claims 9 and 10, the only other claims in the application, stand withdrawn as directed to a non-
elected invention.
1The real party in interest is Agfa-Gevaert.
2Application for patent filed June 29, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007