Appeal 97-1906
Application 08/163,084
account only knowledge known in the art, there is no error).
Since claim 1 is the broadest claim, and it is not directed to
subject matter which would have been obvious over the prior
art, it necessarily follows that narrower claims 2-7 are
likewise not unpatentable over the prior art.
REVERSED.
______________________________
FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
______________________________)
RICHARD E. SCHAFER ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
______________________________)
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 5 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007