THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOHN W. REISCH
RICHARD J. FEEGEL,
and CURTIS P. SMITH
____________
Appeal No. 1997-1991
Application No. 08/376,270
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WARREN, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1 through 6 and 8 through 21, which are
all of the claims pending in this application.
BACKGROUND
At the outset, we note that the present application was
filed as a continuation-in-part of U.S. application No.
08/265,369, which parent application was filed on June 24,
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007