Appeal No. 1997-2036 Application No. 08/335,991 Blanks 4,751,594 Jun. 14, 1988 Dion 5,307,222 Apr. 26, 1994 Brown et al. (Brown) 5,447,695 Sep. 05, 1995 Claim 4 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Brown. Claims 1 through 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Brown in view of Blanks, and further in view of Dion with respect to claim 3. Reference is made to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 9), mailed March 25, 1996) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper No. 16, mailed November 25, 1996) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections, and to appellant's Brief (Paper No. 15, filed August 26, 1996) for appellant's arguments thereagainst. OPINION As a preliminary matter we note that appellant indicates on page 7 of the Brief that the claims are not to stand or fall together. Appellant states that claims 1 through 3 should be considered as one group and claim 4 as a second Therefore, we have not considered them. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007