Appeal No. 1997-2065 Application No. 08/441,948 the claimed subject matter. Accordingly, we reverse the examiner’s decision rejecting all of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As a final point, we observe that appellants disclose at page 13 of the specification that eight Japanese Laid Open Patent applications and four Japanese patents describe applying a force of constraint to the paper in its cross direction during drying. Upon return of this application, the examiner is advised to determine whether these published Japanese applications and patents, either alone or taken together with the above-mentioned references, affect the patentability of the claimed subject matter. In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner is reversed and this application is remanded to the examiner for appropriate action consistent with the above instructions. 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007