Appeal No. 1997-2110
Application No. 08/143,687
c) distributing said presentation characteristics and all
of said content of said object to said context;
d) determining if said object is to be presented
through said context; and
e) if said object is to be presented through said
context, then presenting said object through said context in
accordance with said presentation characteristics.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art:
Vertelney et al. (Vertelney) 5,341,293
Aug. 23, 1994
(Filed Sep. 03,
1992)
Eric Hoffert et al. (Hoffert), “QuickTime : An ExtensibleTM
Standard for Digital Multimedia,” COMPCON ‘92, IEEE Computer
Society International Conference, pp. 15-20 (February 1992).
Wan-teh Chang et al. (Chang), “Call Processing and Signaling
in a Desktop Multimedia Conferencing System,” GLOBECON ‘92,
IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, vol. 1, pp. 225-9
(December 1992).
Claims 1 through 3, 8, 11 through 13, 15 through 17, and
22 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Vertelney. Claims 4 through 7, 9, 18
through 21, and 23 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Vertelney in view of Hoffert.
Claim 14 stands finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Vertelney in view of Chang.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007