THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte KURT M. CONOVER
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2151
Application No. 08/221,959
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 14, 28-31
1
and 33-41 , which are all of the claims pending in this application.
We AFFIRM.
Claims 32 and 42 have been objected to by the examiner as allowable if written in independent1
form.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007