Ex parte REUVEN et al. - Page 5

          Appeal No. 1997-2233                                                        
          Application No. 08/365,384                                                  

          during the reaction to determine the schedule for adding                    
          monomer.  Further, even if we assume that Wingler somehow                   
          suggests predetermining the addition schedule, as the examiner              
          asserts, there is no suggestion to do this by using                         
          appellants' iterative approach in accordance with the                       
          particular set of equations recited in the claim at issue.                  
               For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the examiner                
          is reversed.                                                                

               No period for taking any subsequent action in connection               
          with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR  1.136(a).                   

                         MARC L. CAROFF                )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       ) BOARD OF PATENT              
                         BRADLEY R. GARRIS             )     APPEALS                  
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )       AND                    
                                                       )  INTERFERENCES               

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007