Ex parte JURANOVIC et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 

                                                               Paper No. 23           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      

                  Ex parte LILLIAN R. JURANOVIC and PAUL V. TUZZIO                    
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1997-2257                                  
                             Application No. 08/144,026                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    ____________                                      

          Before CALVERT, FRANKFORT, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent              
          Judges.                                                                     
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2 to              
          16 and 18.  Claim 17, the only other claim remaining in the                 
          application, stands withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR               
           1.142 (b) as being directed to a nonelected invention.                    






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007