THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte HOWARD W. LONG, Dec’d
__________
Appeal No. 1997-2277
Application 08/462,8141
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and SPIEGEL Administrative Patent Judges,
WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed Jun. 5, 1995. According to appellant, this application is
a division of Application No. 07/655,675, filed Feb. 14, 1991 (now U.S. Patent No.
5,441,360), which is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/284,744, filed Dec. 9,
1988 (abandoned), which is a continuation-in-part of Application No. 07/149,686, filed Jan.
28, 1988 (abandoned).
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007