THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte LAMBERTUS J.W. VAN LOON
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-2298
Application 08/329,113
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before BARRETT, FLEMING and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
Appellant requests that we reconsider that part of our
decision of March 28, 2000 wherein we sustained the rejection
of claims 6 and 8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b).
In our previous decision, we determined that the Examiner
was correct in concluding that all of the limitations of
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007