THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal
and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte GLENN L. HENDERSON, RANDAL A. HOKE,
ANNE C. HOPKINS and
DANIEL A. MCLAURIN
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2388
Application No. 08/326,3041
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before ROBINSON, SPIEGEL and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's refusal to allow claims
1, 4, 8, 9, 21, 23, and 25 as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the
1Application for patent filed October 20, 1994. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of application 07/934,847 filed August 25, 1992, now abandoned, which is a continuation of
application 07/272,380 filed November 17, 1988, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007