Ex parte HENDERSON et al. - Page 1




                          THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                        
              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal
                                      and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                          
                                                                                      Paper No. 31            
                             UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                           
                                            AND INTERFERENCES                                                 
                                                 ____________                                                 
                             Ex parte GLENN L. HENDERSON, RANDAL A. HOKE,                                     
                                            ANNE C. HOPKINS and                                               
                                            DANIEL A. MCLAURIN                                                
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                             Appeal No. 1997-2388                                             
                                          Application No. 08/326,3041                                         
                                                 ____________                                                 
                                                   ON BRIEF                                                   
                                                 ____________                                                 

            Before ROBINSON, SPIEGEL and ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                 
            SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                             



                                            DECISION ON APPEAL                                                
                   This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner's refusal to allow claims        
            1, 4, 8, 9, 21, 23, and 25 as amended subsequent to the final rejection (see the                  



                   1Application for patent filed October 20, 1994.  According to appellants, this application is a
            continuation of application 07/934,847 filed August 25, 1992, now abandoned, which is a continuation of
            application 07/272,380 filed November 17, 1988, now abandoned.                                    
                                                      1                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007