Appeal No. 1997-2429 Page 2
Application No. 08/323,215
The appellants' invention relates to a process for
preparing rigid feedblocks of animal feed supplements
(specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is
set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
Theuninck et al. 4,851,244 July 25,
1989
(Theuninck)
Chu et al. 5,140,949 Aug. 25,
1992
(Chu)
Laroche et al. 5,264,227 Nov.
23, 1993
(Laroche)
Claims 1-8 and 10-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Theuninck in view of Laroche.
Claims 9, 10 and 21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over Theuninck in view of Laroche as
applied above, and further in view of Chu.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007