The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RAJES PATEL,
LYLE M. BOWMAN and PENG SHEN
_____________
Appeal 1997-2447
Application 08/248,5001
______________
Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Upon consideration of the primary examiner's rejection of
claims 1-18 and 20-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Patel, U.S. Patent 5,340,572 (1994), Davis,
Application for patent filed 24 May 1994. The real party in interest is InSite1
Vision, Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007