Appeal No. 1997-2667
Application No. 07/632,907
In other words, the applied prior art as whole would have
taught away from the claimed subject matter. Since the
examiner has not established obviousness regarding the claimed
subject matter as indicated supra, we reverse the examiner’s
decision rejecting all of the appealed claims under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as well.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner is
reversed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
REVERSED
CHUNG K. PAK )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
PETER F. KRATZ ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MICHAEL P. TIERNEY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007