Appeal No. 1997-2686
Application 08/346,635
As a result of the amendment after final rejection
noted above, the following rejections were set forth in the
examiner’s answer:
1. Claims 15, 2, 9-12, 14 and 17 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Eggebeen in view of Von Behren.
2. Claims 3-6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Eggebeen in view of
Von Behren and further in view of Newell.
3. Claims 7, 8, 19 and 20 stand rejected under
35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the teachings of
Eggebeen in view of Von Behren and further in view of
Habegger.
4. Claim 13 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Eggebeen in view of
Von Behren and further in view of Balloni.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
-3-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007