Ex parte DUWAER et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1997-2760                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/302,133                                                                                                             

                          the control panel comprises an interactive display panel                                                                      
                 including a touch screen and a graphic tablet, and control                                                                             
                 electronics for the display panel.                                                                                                     
                          The Examiner relies on the following prior art                                                                                
                 references:2                                                                                                                           
                 Nash et al. (Nash)                                    5,010,565                                    Apr. 23,                            
                 1991                                                                                                                                   
                 Takahashi et al. (Takahashi)                                   5,127,050                                    Jun.                       
                 30, 1992                                                                                                                               
                 Krisbergh et al. (Krisbergh)                                   5,138,649                                    Aug.                       
                 11, 1992                                                                                                                               
                 Yaniv (European)                                      0 499 012                                    Aug. 19,                            
                 1992                                                                                                                                   
                          Claims 2-5, 7, and 10-14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                                                                       
                 § 112, first paragraph, as being based on an inadequate                                                                                
                 disclosure.   Claims 2-5, 7, and 10-14 also stand rejected3                                                                                                                  
                 under  35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the                                                                               
                 Examiner offers Takahashi in view of the admitted prior art                                                                            
                 with respect to claims 5 and 10-14.  Yaniv is added to the                                                                             
                 basic combination with respect to claims 2 and 3, Krisbergh is                                                                         


                          2In addition, the Examiner relies on Appellants’                                                                              
                 admissions as to the prior art at pages 2 and 4 of the                                                                                 
                 specification.                                                                                                                         
                          3As indicated at page 2 of the Answer, the 35 U.S.C. §                                                                        
                 112, second paragraph, rejection of the appealed claims has                                                                            
                 been withdrawn.                                                                                                                        
                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007