THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WERNER MAACK ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2850 Application No. 08/417,505 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before THOMAS, KRASS, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 2 through 8 and 11 through 20. Claims 21 through 23 have been allowed by the examiner. The invention is directed to a magnetic head disc device. More particularly, an additional housing is used in order toPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007