Appeal No. 1997-2857
Application 08/171,175
second paragraph. In addition, it is our opinion that the
disclosure of Fincher does not fully meet the invention as
recited in claim 1. Finally, we are of the conclusion that
the evidence relied upon and the level of skill in the
particular art would not have suggested to one of ordinary
skill in the art the invention as set forth in claims 2-5.
Accordingly, we reverse.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007