Appeal No. 1997-2895
Application 08/280,341
Rather than repeat the positions and the arguments of
Appellant and the Examiner, we make reference to the briefs2
and the answer for their respective positions.
OPINION
We have considered the rejections advanced by the
Examiner. We have, likewise, reviewed Appellant's arguments
against the rejections as set forth in the brief.
It is our view, after consideration of the record before
us, that the rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and under 35
U.S.C.
§ 103 are not proper. Accordingly, we reverse.
Analysis
There are various rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102 and 35
U.S.C. § 103. We treat them seriatim.
Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 102
Claims 1, 7, 16, 19, 20, 23, 24, 26 and 29 are under
2A reply brief was filed as paper no. 20 and was entered
in the record without any further response by the Examiner
[paper no. 22].
-4-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007