Appeal No. 1997-2899 Application No. 08/385,574 first communication link and the second communication link; and a receiving means for receiving duplicate information from the second terminal over the first communication link and the second communication link, ... and for replacing the information from the first communications link with corresponding information from the second communications link upon detection of the fault indication signal [emphasis added]. We find that Appellant’s claim 24 includes a transmitting means and a receiving means for simultaneously transmitting and receiving duplicate information over two communication links. Additionally, claim 24 requires that the receiving means monitor the incoming information on both links for a fault indication signal which is sent anytime a failure in the communication link occurs. The received information from the link having a fault signal is replaced by the information from the other link. Claim 24 clearly requires all transmissions and receipts of information to be duplicate and simultaneous over redundant links. This is further supported by Appellant’s disclosure on pages 18 and 19 of the specification and Figure 3 which shows that terminals 310 and 320 transmit and receive two identical copies of the information over identical networks 301 and 302. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007