Appeal No. 1997-2919 Application No. 08/573,921 (claim 7; col. 2, l. 23-25) as being beneficial in that they promote adhesion between a substrate and a subsequently applied palladium-based catalyst or metal layer. With regard to the applicability of Gulla, Bach and Lombardo, appellants argue that those references relate only to organic substrates rather than glass substrates. This argument is unconvincing since all of the applied references appear to be reasonably pertinent to the field of appellants’ process and that of Schnur. In this regard, all of the applied references relate to electroless metal deposition processes involving prior activation of the substrate with a palladium-based catalyst. The teachings of Gulla, Bach and Lombardo appear to generically apply to any substrate involved in such processes. For instance, in Gulla, organic (epoxy) substrates are mentioned only by way of example. There is nothing to indicate that Gulla’s teachings are limited to organic substrates. More to the point, Bach (col. 4, l. 66- col. 5, l. 4; col. 11, l. 57-60) clearly indicates that, in general, “any number of different types of non-conductive substrates” are considered to be within this field of endeavor, either “organic or inorganic” substrates. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007