Appeal No. 1997-2958 10
Application No. 08/401,719
notes, in the final rejection, that the percent rolling reduction overlaps appellants range and optimization
would have been obvious. Komatsubara discloses at column 7, lines 48-
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007