THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 39
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte TIMOTHY R. PRYOR
__________
Appeal No. 1997-2981
Application 08/161,3041
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before KRASS, FLEMING, and FRAHM, Administrative Patent
Judges.
1Application for patent filed December 2, 1993. According
to appellant, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/848,937, filed March 10, 1992, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 07/509,295, filed April
16, 1990, now U.S. Patent No. 5,112,131; which is a
continuation of Application 07/042,527, filed April 27, 1987,
now U.S. Patent No. 5,012,574; which is a continuation of
Application 06/767,374, filed August 20, 1985, now abandoned;
which is a continuation of Application 06/560,259, filed
December 12, 1983, now U.S. Patent No. 4,559,684; which is a
continuation of Application 03/238,702, filed February 21,
1981, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007