THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 23 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ROBERT E. MULLEN, JR. ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2987 Application No. 08/190,389 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 30, all of the claims pending in the application. The invention is directed to a protocol converter for interfacing various on-line process equipment with a host computer in a semiconductor manufacturing environment. Independent claim 1, which is representative of the claimed subject matter, is reproduced as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007