Ex parte MEIXNER et al. - Page 1




           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                    publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                              Paper No. 24        



                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                   
                                    ____________                                  
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                       
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                
                                    ____________                                  
                              Ex parte JÜRGEN MEIXNER,                            
                                 WOLFGANG FISCHER,                                
                                        and                                       
                                    JOSEF PEDAIN                                  
                                    ____________                                  
                                Appeal No. 1997-3013                              
                             Application No. 08/383,328                           
                                    ____________                                  
                                      ON BRIEF                                    
                                    ____________                                  


         Before KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge, McKELVEY, Senior             
         Administrative Patent Judge, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent         
         Judge.                                                                   
         DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


                      DECISION ON APPEAL UNDER 35 U.S.C. § 134                    
              Upon consideration of the record, it is:                            
                   ORDERED that the examiner’s rejection of claims                










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007