Appeal No. 1997-3062 Application No. 08/207,370 supra, the printer will be set in a ready state in response to the sensing of the approach of a computer user. There can be no doubt that Mese teaches the sensing of an approach of a user to the computer. See column 4, lines 2 et seq. of Mese. With regard to the “scheduled use” argument, the “scheduled use” of the controlled object by a user in Mese is, indeed, controlled. The controlled object is not placed in a ready state until the approach of a user is sensed. At that point, one can say that the controlled object, e.g., a printer, is placed in a ready state in anticipation of a user manipulating inputs to the computer. The time during which a user employs the computer, or manipulates the keyboard, may be said to be a “scheduled use,” as broadly claimed by claims 10 and 11. Similar to appellant’s invention, the sensing of an approach by a user in the Mese system “assumes the presence of the scheduled use of said [controlled object which may be a] printer.” Appellant’s arguments at pages 9-10 of the brief regarding the missing features of Mese and Nakanishi amount to arguments against the references individually and do not 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007