Ex parte SEMENIK et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 14              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte SCOTT SEMENIK,                                 
                                   FRANK ANNERINO,                                    
                                 and MARTIN KIMBELL                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-3090                                  
                               Application 08/309,280                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before FLEMING, JERRY SMITH, and RUGGIERO, Administrative                   
          Patent Judges.                                                              
          FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       

                                                                                     
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 5 through 13.  Claims 1 through 4 have been allowed.                 
          Claim 14 has been canceled.                                                 
               The invention relates to vibrators and, more                           
          particularly, to brackets for mounting vibrators.  Appellants               

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007