Ex parte KING et al. - Page 1



                                                       Paper No. 17                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                           
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                                Ex parte JAMES H. KING,                               
                                   WAYNE F. BULTEMEIER                                
                                  and JAMES L. ROUSSEY                                
                                     ______________                                   
                                   Appeal No. 1997-3121                               
                              Application 07/987,048                                  
                                    _______________                                   
                              HEARD: MARCH 9, 2000                                    
                                    _______________                                   
          Before JERRY SMITH, LALL and FRAHM, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   
                                                                                     
                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                 

          This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134                      
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-15, which                   
          constituted all the claims in the application.  A first amendment           
          after final rejection was filed on June 29, 1996 but was denied             
          entry by the examiner.  A second amendment after final rejection            
          was filed on August 29, 1996 and was entered by the examiner.               
                                            1                                         




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007