Appeal No. 1997-3135 Application 08/208,497 Abelson et al. (Abelson), “Sustained Reduction of Intraocular Pressure in Humans With the Calcium Channel Blocker Verapamil,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 105, pp. 155-59 (Feb. 1988) The issue presented for review is whether the examiner erred in rejecting claims 9- 14 and 21-29 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over the combined disclosures of Fujita and Abelson. Our deliberations in this matter have included evaluation and review of the following materials: (1) the instant specification, including all of the claims on appeal; (2) applicants' Appeal Brief and Reply Brief; (3) the Yamauch declaration, filed under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.132, dated November 14, 1994; (4) the Examiner's Answer and the communication mailed by the examiner March 19, 1996; and (5) the above-cited references relied on by the examiner. On consideration of the record, including the above-listed materials, we reverse the examiner's rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103. DISCUSSION The appealed claims relate to a method for treating glaucoma by administering an effective amount of a therapeutic agent comprising, as the active ingredient, a specified 2-phenyl-3-oxo-2H-1,4-benzothiazine compound and a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent and/or carrier to a patient suffering from glaucoma. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007