Ex parte HOLLARS et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)              
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is                 
          not binding precedent of the Board.                                         
                                                            Paper No. 30              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                     __________                                       
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                     __________                                       
                   Ex parte DENNIS R. HOLLARS, DELBERT F. WALTRIP,                    
                  ROBERT B. ZUBECK, JOSEF BONIGUT, ROBERT M. SMITH                    
                                  and GARY L. PAYNE                                   
                                     __________                                       
                                Appeal No. 1997-3172                                  
                               Application 08/045,989                                 
                                     ___________                                      
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                     ___________                                      
          Before WINTERS, OWENS and ROBINSON, Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                      DECISION                                        
               This is an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to allow                 
          claims 1, 6, 7 and 12-15 as amended after final rejection.                  
          These are all of the claims remaining in the application.                   
                                    THE INVENTION                                     

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007