Appeal No. 1997-3224 Application No. 08/231,531 performed until a play command is selected. Appellants further emphasize this point on page 4 of the reply brief stating that the references do not teach automatically generating a graphical representation of a functional relationship between the second operation represented by the second graphical object and the first operation represented by the first graphical object. On page 20 of the Examiner's answer, the Examiner responds to this argument stating that the operation could be the displaying operation itself. Appellants respond on page 4 of the reply brief that the Examiner's interpretation is misplaced because the preamble of claim 1 refers to graphical representation operations performed in a computer and the body includes graphical representations of the first operation and graphical representations of the second operation. Upon our review of Kodosky, Macromedia Director Overview Manual and Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines, we fail to find that these references teach these claimed limitations. Appellants' claim 1 clearly requires automatically generating a graphical representation of a functional relationship between -10-Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007