THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PHILLIP C. YU, DAVID L. BACKFISCH,
JOHN B. SLOBODNIK and THOMAS G. RUKAVINA
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-3302
Application No. 08/152,338
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, WALTZ, and LIEBERMAN, Administrative
Patent Judges.
JOHN D. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
final rejection of claims 21 through 39.
Claim 21 is representative and is reproduced below:
21. A method for fabricating an electrochromic article
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007