Appeal No. 1997-3499
Application 08/366,281
For the reasons stated above, we conclude that the
Examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of
obviousness with respect to claim 1. Claims 9, 17, and 21
contain similar limitations to the missing critical limitation
about the scrubber means reading out data for use by the virus
signature detection process and, accordingly, stand with
claim 1. The rejection of claims 1, 8, 9, 16, 17, and 21 is
reversed.
REVERSED
ERROL A. KRASS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LEE E. BARRETT ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
STUART N. HECKER )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 10 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007