Appeal No. 1997-3670
Application No. 08/541,799
Accordingly, we make no determination that none of the applied references may or
may not be applicable to the instant claimed subject matter but only that the examiner has
not established a prima facie case of anticipation of the claimed subject matter since the
examiner has either ignored specific claim limitations or cavalierly brushed the limitations
aside by asserting them to “read on any computer control.”
We have reversed the rejection of claims 1-38 under 35 U.S.C. § 112 and we have
reversed the rejection of claims 1-37 under 35 U.S.C. § 102.
The examiner’s decision is reversed.
REVERSED
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
ERROL A. KRASS ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
eak/vsh
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007