The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 31
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DANIEL J. GRIMM and MARK S. LEUENBERGER
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3797
Application No. 08/121,820
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before COHEN, NASE, and JENNIFER D. BAHR, Administrative Patent
Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 25 to 41, which are all of the claims
pending in this application.2
1On August 28, 2000, the appellants waived the oral
hearing (see Paper No. 30) scheduled for October 11, 2000.
2The appellants have stated (brief, pp. 5 and 13) that
claim 36 is identical to claim 30 and should be cancelled.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007