Appeal No. 1997-3814 Page 4
Application No. 08/601,461
Perez 3 1,047,276 Dec. 14,
1953
(France)
D'Avignonet et al. 4 2,397,793 Feb.
16, 1979
(D'Avignonet) (France)
Caggiano 5 0 488 447 June 3,
1992
(European Patent Application)
In addition, the examiner also relied upon the appellant's
admission of prior art found on page 1 of the specification.
Claims 1, 2 and 4 to 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over appellant's admission of prior
art as further evidenced by Stump in view of Collier further
in view of Perez, D'Avignonet, Hodska and Caggiano, further in
view of Zabriskie, further in view of Chamberlain and Wheless.
3In determining the teachings of Perez, we will rely on
the translation provided by the PTO. A copy of the
translation is attached for the appellant's convenience.
4The examiner has referred to this reference as
"Reference L." In determining the teachings of D'Avignonet,
we will rely on the translation provided by the PTO. A copy
of the translation is attached for the appellant's
convenience.
5The examiner has referred to this reference as
"Unilever."
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007